collaboration

AO. shared (expensive) lab materials as basis for collaboration

AO: They write: “Differences in the propensity of countries to collaborate internationally can be explained partly by intellectual influence: The less developed the scientific

TECHNO: (How) are technological infrastructures said to shape, enable and constrain collaboration at this stage of the research process?

Luukkonen, Terttu, Olle Persson, and Gunnar Sivertsen. 1992. “Understanding Patterns of International Scientific Collaboration.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 17 (1): 101–26.

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. Wood- Gray: no tech infrastructures

AO: They do not discuss technological infrastructures.

TECHNO: (How) are technological infrastructures said to shape, enable and constrain collaboration at this stage of the research process?

Wood, Donna J., and Barbara Gray. 1991. “Toward a Comprehensive Theory of Collaboration.” The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 27 (2): 139–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886391272001.

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. strategic use turning the diversity of epistemic cultures into a resource marks the politics of collaboration

AO: The analysts highlight that the strategic use turning the diversity of epistemic cultures into a resource marks the politics of collaboration. It is a bit difficult to nail

EPISTEMIC CULTURES: (How) are epistemic cultures said to shape collaboration at this stage of the research process?

Fortun, Kim, and Todd Cherkasky. “Counter‐expertise and the Politics of Collaboration.” Science as Culture 7, no. 2 (June 1998): 145–72.

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. Wood and Gray - discursive risk

AO: This is a discourse analysis of the way that organizational theorists are thinking about collaboration (authors map nine papers over 6 domains of collaboration to

DISCURSIVE RISKS: What are the epistemic assumptions of the analyst of collaboration?

Wood, Donna J., and Barbara Gray. 1991. “Toward a Comprehensive Theory of Collaboration.” The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 27 (2): 139–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886391272001.

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. Griffin and Hayler - Data

AO: Analysts cite Hockey (2012) who uses the term “indirect collaboration” to describe the “reusability” of data and tools produced in the academy that find application and use

DATA: How does the analyst point to the data practices in the collaboration? Or to the data produced about the collaboration? Where does that data travel?

Griffin, Gabriele, and Matt Steven Hayler. 2018. “Collaboration in Digital Humanities Research – Persisting Silences.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 012 (1).

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

Querying Collaboration in Artifact Production

View Essay

AO. “organization” as both a social body as well as broad discourses

AO: The analysts argue that double binds are created and sustained by work within organizations. They define “organization” both as a social body in which intersubjective exchange is

MESO: (How) are power relations said to shape the dynamics of collaboration at this research stage? What organizations are said to shape collaborations?

Fortun, Kim, and Todd Cherkasky. “Counter‐expertise and the Politics of Collaboration.” Science as Culture 7, no. 2 (June 1998): 145–72.

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. marginality creates its own margins.

AO: Authors argue for working the metaphoric image of the “double bind” which project situations of disjuncture and unresolvable contradictions.
AO: The

Anything else? Exemplary quotes?

Fortun, Kim, and Todd Cherkasky. “Counter‐expertise and the Politics of Collaboration.” Science as Culture 7, no. 2 (June 1998): 145–72.

Analyzing Representations of "Local Knowledge" in Tech Development Decolonizing the University Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. Nayantara - practices

AO: Analysts do not note specific practices but they call for “strengthening of respectful collaborative spaces for scholarship to flourish in a way that is truly concerned with...Read more

PRACTICES: What “best practices” does the analyst believe make for improved collaboration?

Nayantara Appleton et al. 2018. “Respect, Care, and Labor in Collaborative Scholarly Projects | Somatosphere.” Somatospher

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

Search form