AO. Aellah - no "right" answer to ethical collaboration. Need process of long-term engagement across difference.

  • AO: Analysts do not provide a “right answer” at the end of their fictitious stories, highlighting their assumption that there is not one right way to tackle the ethics involved. Nonetheless, they have “learning objectives” identified in the index of case studies at the back of the book. For example, the data trouble chapter notes: “To explore access to, use, and ownership of participants’ health data in collaborative medical research, and through this to reflect on collaboration between unequal partners.”

  • AO: The analysts hold that collaborative relationships will also (always?) necessarily involve ethical challenges (in the context of research).

  • AO: Analysts believe that successful collaboration (which has strong dialogue and deliberation) creates a wide range of relations that now only allow for science but also growth of personal relations which then produce even “better science” (235). Analysts argue for this process of “long-term engagement across difference.”

Artifact

Analytic (Question)

URI

pece_annotation_1535343907

Tags

License

Creative Commons Licence