Research Design

AO. participation as users.

AO: Participation as users. “Our engagement with CTVC is allowing us to discover “local protocols” of collaboration and discussion. After joining these channels, we can adapt them to...Read more

PRACTICES: What “best practices” does the analyst believe make for improved collaboration?

Halabi, Ammar, Basile Zimmermann, and Michele Courant. 2013. “Participate, Collaborate, and Decide: Defining Design Problems in a Syrian Community.” In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on ICTD, 49–52. ICTD ’13. New York, NY, USA: ACM.

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. elites (and non-elites?)

AO: Binaries and metaphors are not used explicitly but in naming a reconstitution of anthropology towards “elites,” the analysts are also implying the opposite of elites (non-elites)...Read more

TEXT: What binaries or metaphors are used within this artifact?

Holmes, Douglas R., and George E. Marcus. 2008. “Collaboration Today and the Re-Imagination of the Classic Scene of Fieldwork Encounter.” Collaborative Anthropologies 1 (1): 81–101.

Analyzing Representations of "Local Knowledge" in Tech Development Decolonizing the University Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. transdisciplinary "team science"

AO: The analysts are looking at “team science” which they note can be conducted within a single, focused discipline or can span multiple disciplines. They also describe

MICRO: What did the analyst choose to describe as collaboration?

Hall, Kara L., Annie X. Feng, Richard P. Moser, Daniel Stokols, and Brandie K. Taylor. 2008. “Moving the Science of Team Science Forward: Collaboration and Creativity.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine, The Science of Team Science, 35 .

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. readiness factors and assessments of productivity.

AO: The analysts note that the science of team science is currently in its nascent stage and that definitions are being debated. For example, interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary

META: What discourses does the analyst consider/leverage to characterize/theorize collaboration at this research stage? (How) are histories and contextual factors pointed to as shaping the collaborations described here at this research stage?

Hall, Kara L., Annie X. Feng, Richard P. Moser, Daniel Stokols, and Brandie K. Taylor. 2008. “Moving the Science of Team Science Forward: Collaboration and Creativity.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine, The Science of Team Science, 35 .

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. unsettled roles.

AO: The analysts argue that contemporary ethnography’s preferred collaboration is with “the expert” who is now a preferred subject because within the expert’s cultural milieu,

MICRO: What did the analyst choose to describe as collaboration?

Holmes, Douglas R., and George E. Marcus. 2008. “Collaboration Today and the Re-Imagination of the Classic Scene of Fieldwork Encounter.” Collaborative Anthropologies 1 (1): 81–101.

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. intellectual partners - "found reflexive subjects"

AO: A discursive risk in this analysis is the assumption of intellectual partners among “elite” communities. I think the example of “professionalized” Kibera research subjects who

DISCURSIVE RISKS: What are the epistemic assumptions of the analyst of collaboration?

Holmes, Douglas R., and George E. Marcus. 2008. “Collaboration Today and the Re-Imagination of the Classic Scene of Fieldwork Encounter.” Collaborative Anthropologies 1 (1): 81–101.

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. refunctioning of ethnography given changing times

AO: The analysts do not think of collaboration as a new methodological tool (as it has for example been treated in development work), rather, they argued that it is central to the

DEUTERO: How is this analyst denoting and worrying about collaboration?

Holmes, Douglas R., and George E. Marcus. 2008. “Collaboration Today and the Re-Imagination of the Classic Scene of Fieldwork Encounter.” Collaborative Anthropologies 1 (1): 81–101.

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. upfront collaborators who discuss what is wrong

AO: Analysts credited their collaborators “substantial experience in Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) techniques and their willingness to utilise PRA” to make the main research

NANO: What traits does the analyst believe make a good collaborator? Is the analyst interested in how the collaboration stabilizes or how it fails or shifts?

Jentsch, Birgit, and Catherine Pilley. 2003. “Research Relationships between the South and the North: Cinderella and the Ugly Sisters?” Social Science & Medicine (1982) 57 (10): 1957–67.

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. unequal funding

AO: unequal funding (Northern funding is much more prolific and then sets the agenda for the project).Read more

ECO: What material constraints are said to undergird this collaboration?

Jentsch, Birgit, and Catherine Pilley. 2003. “Research Relationships between the South and the North: Cinderella and the Ugly Sisters?” Social Science & Medicine (1982) 57 (10): 1957–67.

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

Halpern, Megan K., Ingrid Erickson, Laura Forlano, and Geri K. Gay. “Designing Collaboration: Comparing Cases Exploring Cultural Probes as Boundary-Negotiating Objects,” 1093. ACM Press, 2013.

ABSTRACT: This paper examines the use of cultural probes as a method for fostering collaboration within groups of diverse experts working on creative projects. Using two case examples, we show that probes—short, oblique, and at times whimsical sets of activity prompts—have boundary object...Read more

AO. Stabilizing notions and definitions of collaboration to legitimize and justify the emerging field

AO: The analysts assume that strategies of creativity and innovation are needed to move the field forward and further improve public health science and practice (S243).

DISCURSIVE RISKS: What are the epistemic assumptions of the analyst of collaboration?

Hall, Kara L., Annie X. Feng, Richard P. Moser, Daniel Stokols, and Brandie K. Taylor. 2008. “Moving the Science of Team Science Forward: Collaboration and Creativity.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine, The Science of Team Science, 35 .

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. "collaborative" milieu

AO: They do not talk about this explicitly but they note the collaborative milieu that is now the normative environment of research (which is supported by research grants and “

MACRO: (How) are economic and legal infrastructures said to shape, enable and constrain collaboration at this stage of the research process? What incentives and benefits are said to be part of collaboration at this stage of the research process?

Holmes, Douglas R., and George E. Marcus. 2008. “Collaboration Today and the Re-Imagination of the Classic Scene of Fieldwork Encounter.” Collaborative Anthropologies 1 (1): 81–101.

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

Search form