Practice

AO. Wood- Gray: no tech infrastructures

AO: They do not discuss technological infrastructures.

TECHNO: (How) are technological infrastructures said to shape, enable and constrain collaboration at this stage of the research process?

Wood, Donna J., and Barbara Gray. 1991. “Toward a Comprehensive Theory of Collaboration.” The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 27 (2): 139–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886391272001.

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. “organization” as both a social body as well as broad discourses

AO: The analysts argue that double binds are created and sustained by work within organizations. They define “organization” both as a social body in which intersubjective exchange is

MESO: (How) are power relations said to shape the dynamics of collaboration at this research stage? What organizations are said to shape collaborations?

Fortun, Kim, and Todd Cherkasky. “Counter‐expertise and the Politics of Collaboration.” Science as Culture 7, no. 2 (June 1998): 145–72.

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. Cervone - nano

AO: Citing Kelty, the analyst calls collaboration: “mutifaceted and rhizomic” and asks if it could be too weak of a word to describe the entanglements of complicity, cultural

NANO: What traits does the analyst believe make a good collaborator? Is the analyst interested in how the collaboration stabilizes or how it fails or shifts?

Cervone, Emma. 2015. “The Promises and Conundrums of Decolonized Collaboration.” In Indigenous Studies and Engaged Anthropology: The Collaborative Moment, edited by Paul Sillitoe, 95–114. Farnham, Surrey, UK ; Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

Fortun, Michael. “Institutionalizing Indirection: Science at the Crossroads of Scholarship and Politics.” Science as Culture 7, no. 2 (June 1998): 173–92.

In this article, Mike Fortun discusses discusses the complicated double-binds that impacted his "response-ability" while working in and on the Institute for Science and Interdisciplinary Studies (ISIS).Read more

AO. missing data

AO: Not mentioned.Read more

DATA: How does the analyst point to the data practices in the collaboration? Or to the data produced about the collaboration? Where does that data travel?

Handgraaf, Michel J. J., and W. Fred van Raaij. 2005. “Fear and Loathing No More: The Emergence of Collaboration between Economists and Psychologists.” Journal of Economic Psychology, Tilburg Symposium on Psychology and Economics: Games and Decisions, 26

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

FORTUN, KIM. “THE BHOPAL DISASTER: Advocacy and Expertise.” SCIENCE AS CULTURE, n.d., 13.

In this article, Kim Fortun discusses her affiliation with the Bhopal Group for Information and Action and her experiences as an advocate for the Bhopal Gas Affected Working Women's Union. She uses this discussion to develop a theory of advocacy "as a way to expertise, which complicates...Read more

AO. Growing number of interdisciplinary journals

AO: Not mentioned but the creation of numerous journals that touch on econ and psych are noted.

TECHNO: (How) are technological infrastructures said to shape, enable and constrain collaboration at this stage of the research process?

Handgraaf, Michel J. J., and W. Fred van Raaij. 2005. “Fear and Loathing No More: The Emergence of Collaboration between Economists and Psychologists.” Journal of Economic Psychology, Tilburg Symposium on Psychology and Economics: Games and Decisions, 26

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. Cervone - eco

AO: She does not describe this but it would be assumed that the colonial acts of taking native lands and one's relationship to those lands.

ECO: What material constraints are said to undergird this collaboration?

Cervone, Emma. 2015. “The Promises and Conundrums of Decolonized Collaboration.” In Indigenous Studies and Engaged Anthropology: The Collaborative Moment, edited by Paul Sillitoe, 95–114. Farnham, Surrey, UK ; Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. collaboration for better policy and “efficiency of interventions”

AO: Not discussed although it is suggested that greater collaboration between economists and psychologists can lead to better policy and “efficiency of interventions” (390)Read more

MACRO: (How) are economic and legal infrastructures said to shape, enable and constrain collaboration at this stage of the research process? What incentives and benefits are said to be part of collaboration at this stage of the research process?

Handgraaf, Michel J. J., and W. Fred van Raaij. 2005. “Fear and Loathing No More: The Emergence of Collaboration between Economists and Psychologists.” Journal of Economic Psychology, Tilburg Symposium on Psychology and Economics: Games and Decisions, 26

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. Fortun and Cherkasky. Discursive Risk.

AO: This editorial intro by Fortun and Cherkasky focuses largely on the meta, nano and practice (micro) levels of conceptualizing “counter-expertise”.Read more

DISCURSIVE RISKS: What are the epistemic assumptions of the analyst of collaboration?

Fortun, Kim, and Todd Cherkasky. “Guest Editorial: Strategizing Counter‐expertise.” Science as Culture 7, no. 2 (June 1998): 141–44.

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. shared topic interests.

AO: Shared topic interests (e.g. discussion about the self-interested nature of people; historically different opinion with regard to the rationality of people).Read more

EPISTEMIC CULTURES: (How) are epistemic cultures said to shape collaboration at this stage of the research process?

Handgraaf, Michel J. J., and W. Fred van Raaij. 2005. “Fear and Loathing No More: The Emergence of Collaboration between Economists and Psychologists.” Journal of Economic Psychology, Tilburg Symposium on Psychology and Economics: Games and Decisions, 26

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

AO. Wood and Gray - comprehensive theory of collaboration

AO: The analysts are focused on the preconditions that make collaboration possible and motivate stakeholders (why would one participate in a collaboration?), the process

DEUTERO: How is this analyst denoting and worrying about collaboration?

Wood, Donna J., and Barbara Gray. 1991. “Toward a Comprehensive Theory of Collaboration.” The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 27 (2): 139–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886391272001.

Querying Analyses of Collaboration and Approaches to Data

Search form