Understanding anthropological understanding: For a merological anthropology

TitleUnderstanding anthropological understanding: For a merological anthropology
Publication TypeJournal Article
AuthorsZeitlyn, David
JournalAnthropological Theory
Volume9
Issue2
Pagination209-231
ISSN1463-4996
AbstractIn this article I argue for a merological anthropology in which ideas of `partiality' and `practical adequacy' provide a way out of the impasse of relativism which is implied by postmodernism and the related abandonment of a concern with `truth'. Ideas such as `aptness' and `faithfulness' enable us to re-establish empirical foundations without having to espouse a simple realism which has been rightly criticized. Ideas taken from ethnomethodology, particularly the way we bootstrap from `practical adequacy' to `warrants for confidence', point to a merological anthropology in which we recognize that we do not and cannot know everything, but that we can have reasons for being confident in the little we know.
URLhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1463499609103550
DOI10.1177/1463499609103550
Short TitleUnderstanding anthropological understanding
Collection: