| Title | Editorial Work and the Peer Review Economy of STS Journals |
| Publication Type | Journal Article |
| Authors | Kaltenbrunner, Wolfgang, Kean Birch, and Maria Amuchastegui |
| Journal | Science, Technology, & Human Values |
| Pagination | 01622439211068798 |
| ISSN | 0162-2439 |
| Abstract | In this paper, we analyze the role of science and technology studies (STS) journal editors in organizing and maintaining the peer review economy. We specifically conceptualize peer review as a gift economy running on perpetually renewed experiences of mutual indebtedness among members of an intellectual community. While the peer review system is conventionally presented as self-regulating, we draw attention to its vulnerabilities and to the essential curating function of editors. Aside from inherent complexities, there are various shifts in the broader political?economic and sociotechnical organization of scholarly publishing that have recently made it more difficult for editors to organize robust cycles of gift exchange. This includes the increasing importance of journal metrics and associated changes in authorship practices; the growth and differentiation of the STS journal landscape; and changes in publishing funding models and the structure of the publishing market through which interactions among authors, editors, and reviewers are reconfigured. To maintain a functioning peer review economy in the face of numerous pressures, editors must balance contradictory imperatives: the need to triage intellectual production and rely on established cycles of gift exchange for efficiency, and the need to expand cycles of gift exchange to ensure the sustainability and diversity of the peer review economy. |
| URL | https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439211068798 |
| DOI | 10.1177/01622439211068798 |
Zotero attachments as links:
