AO: The analysts argued that drawing on the “analytical acumen and existential insights of research subjects to recast the intellectual imperatives of the researcher’s own methodological practices, in short, the para-ethnographic practices of subjects” is key (82).
AO: deferring to subject’s mode of knowing (82) and deferral to appropriation (93)
AO: renegotiation of the rules of engagement with the dialogic, epistemic subject opens the intellectual space for a rethinking of collaboration. (85)
AO: “conceptual work of an altogether different order is going on when the categories that inform the ethnog- rapher’s frame are being appropriated.” (93)
AO: “shared conceptual labor” (97)
