Found 198 results
Galloway AR.  0.  The Cybernetic Hypothesis. differences. 25(1):107-131.
Henrich A, Gradl T.  0.  DARIAH(-DE): Digital Research Infrastructure for the Arts and Humanities — Concepts and Perspectives. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing. 7(supplement):47-58.
Olsen SAnni.  0.  DASISH Deliverables.
Golumbia D.  0.  Death of a Discipline. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies. 25(1):156-176.
Marcus G.  0.  The Debate over Parody in Copyright Law: An Experiment in Cultural Critique. Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities. 1(2)
Gold MK.  0.  Debates in the Digital Humanities. :534.
McPherson T.  0.  Designing for Difference. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies. 25(1):178-188.
Almas B, Beaulieu M-C.  0.  Developing a New Integrated Editing Platform for Source Documents in Classics. Literary and Linguistic Computing. 28(4):493-503.
Hanseth O, Monteiro E, Hatling M.  0.  Developing Information Infrastructure: The Tension Between Standardization and Flexibility. Science, Technology & Human Values. 21(4):407-426.
Haack S.  0.  Deviant Logic, Fuzzy Logic: Beyond the Formalism. :329.
Karasti H, Baker KS.  0.  Digital Data Practices and the Long Term Ecological Research Program Growing Global. International Journal of Digital Curation. 3(2):42-58.
Hsu WF.  0.  Digital Ethnography Toward Augmented Empiricism: A New Methodological Framework.
Blanke T., Hedges M., Palmer R..  0.  Digital surrogates for Humanities research. :275-280.
Suchman L.  0.  Do categories have politics? Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). 2(3):177-190.
Price KM.  0.  Edition, Project, Database, Archive, Thematic Research Collection: What's in a Name? Digital Humanities Quarterly. 003(3)
Leek J.  0.  The Elements of Data Analytic Style.
Drucker J.  0.  Entity to Event: From Literal, Mechanistic Materiality to Probabilistic Materiality. Parallax. 15(4):7-17.
Turkle S, Papert S.  0.  Epistemological Pluralism: Styles and Voices within the Computer Culture. Signs. 16(1):128-157.
Bueno-Soler J., Carnielli W..  0.  e-Reasoning: Between Digital Humanities and #x00A0; #x00A0;e-science. 2:33-35.
Wardrip-Fruin N.  0.  Expressive Processing: Digital Fictions, Computer Games, and Software Studies. :504.
Tonne D., Stotzka R., Jejkal T., Hartmann V., Pasic H., Rapp A., Vanscheidt P., Neumair B., Streit A., Garcia A. et al..  0.  A Federated Data Zone for the Arts and Humanities. :198-205.
Kwan M-P.  0.  Feminist Visualization: Re-envisioning GIS as a Method in Feminist Geographic Research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 92(4):645-661.
Lohr S.  0.  For Big-Data Scientists, ‘Janitor Work’ Is Key Hurdle to Insights.
Kuster M.W..  0.  The Four and a Half Challenges of Humanities Data. :1017-1023.
Corbel S, J. Wellmann F.  0.  Framework for multiple hypothesis testing improves the use of legacy data in structural geological modeling. GeoResJ. 6:202-212.